[Charlie LaBaw]

regexp — {\.sk+(d)\} $a b1 b2

regsub -all — {\.sk+(d)\} $a [string repeat “A” $b2] c

[Charlie LaBaw]

For your outbound variant, make sure the “Repeats” value for the field on the segments tab is set to the desired value.

[Charlie LaBaw]

Here is how I have been able to work with the date. This is a Pre-proc in a copy statement.

set date [clock format [clock scan today] -format %Y-%m-%d]

set xlateOutVals [lindex

0]

[Charlie LaBaw]

This is what I did to get the 5.7 Rev 1 client running on a Windows 7 Enterprise 32-bit PC.

1. copied the 5.7 client CD to the local hard drive

2. right clicked setup.exe and changed the compatibility mode to XP SP3

3. right clicked setup.exe and ran as administrator, installation ran normally with no errors

4. manually copied the Rev 1 files to the local locations

So far, I have not had any problems.

[Charlie LaBaw]

I was able to install the 5.7 client on a Windows 7 (Enterprise edition) PC by using the XP compatibility mode. I have been using it for about a week now with no issues.

[Charlie LaBaw]

I was able to run the following with no errors:

set MSH8 A08

set PV131 {0}

set PV132 B7x

set mh message

if {[string equal $MSH8 “A08″] && [string equal $PV131 ” “]} {

   set dispList

} else {

   set dispList

}

                   

if {[string equal $PV132 “B7E”]} {

   set dispList

} else {

   set dispList

}

puts “dispList: $dispList”

[Charlie LaBaw]

I believe you need to remove the } { which are to the left and right of &&. Also, the }

               else {

should probably be } else {.

[Charlie LaBaw]

I did test the X12 278 messages generated by my test thread with the X12 testing tool. The ones with a dependent loop were parsed correctly at any detail level. The ones without a dependent loop complained about segments out of order.

Charlie

[Charlie LaBaw]

5.5 Rev1 AIX 5.3

We are going from an frl to X12 HIPAA-004010A1/v1 278. In our testing, on the engine we can translate with no errors. When using the testing tool, however, we get errors (out of order for message type ‘278’) whenever the detail level is set to anything other than “Detail level 0 (least).” This is true whether testing the xlt or x12 and is the same in the GUI and command line. The errors occur only for the messages without a dependent loop.

If we set up a test thread with our Xlate, the desired X12 HIPAA-004010A1/v1 278 messages are produced with no errors. Both types of messages, with and without dependent loops, are processed error free.

Charlie

[Charlie LaBaw]

I would definitely be interested in the Level 2 class in W-S.

Charlie LaBaw

Mission Hospitals

Asheville, NC

ccscjl@msj.org

[Author]

Replies