ADT wild card routing

[Gary Atkinson]

I would like to use wildcard routing for a new ADT project.  Do you have to make a generic variant of all the ADT types you want to route?  I used a variant using ADT_A01, but when MSH:9 in the message is ADT^A02, the output in MSH:9 is still ADT^A01.  Is the engine outputting ADT^A01, because the variant is using ADT^A01?

Here is input message I am testing with:

Code:

0000000672MSH:;~&:SPC:N:IM:N:200704271337::ADT;A02;41:6429603:P:2.2:6429603::AL
PID::00554801:0000035424;;;N:1115970;N13281500:XXXX;XXXX;M;::19410305:F::1:7639
PARADISE BEACH RD;;PASADENA;MD;21122;US;C;02:02:(410)255-2578::ENGLISH;E;:M:MET;
NK1:1:XXXX;XXXXXX;RSR:H;;:7639 PARADISE BEACH RD;;PASADENA;MD;21122;US:(410)255-
PV1::I:PAU;PACU;2;N;;;I:3::ICU;ICU;11;N;;;:50;C;ME;T;;;MD::””:SUR::::1

Output looks like this:

Code:

MESSAGE 1
0(0).MSH(0)  :  >|^~&|STAR|BWMC|||||ADT^A01|6429603|P|2.3< 0(0).EVN(0)  :  >|A02|200704271336< 0(0).PID(0)  :  >||554801|0000035424|1115970|XXXX^XXXXX^M||19410305|F||||||||||0711700059|217384220< 0(0).PV1(0)  : >||I|PAU^PACU^2|||ICU^ICU^11|50^C^ME^T^^^MD|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||200704271327<

[/code]

Topic

[Russ Ross]

We do not use wild card routing so far but I want to say that I think if you do not map the MSH-9 field in your xlate it will default to the message type of the outbound variant (ADT^A01 in your case).

Since I have been mapping every individual field for many years now it has been a while since I can recall what you are describing but it does ring a bell.

Russ Ross
RussRoss318@gmail.com

[Gary Atkinson]

Duh  😳 I think I forgot to add in the copy of MSH:9.  Let me fix that and see what it does.  😆

[Gary Atkinson]

Yep, that did it.  Thx Ross!

[Author]

Replies