<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Todd Gruden | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/todd-gruden/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/todd-gruden/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Todd Gruden.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:18:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a2eb0ddf3953f91d29e2942738515cd3</guid>
				<title>Todd Gruden replied to the topic SMATDB disk requirements to idx requirements in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/smatdb-disk-requirements-to-idx-requirements/#post-83766</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2016 16:37:25 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an Engineer on Bob Schmid&#8217;s team and I ran through a couple of scenarios to compare disk usage between SMAT files and SMATdb. &nbsp;</p>
<p>1. I took a SMATdb and ran hcismatconvert to create .msg, .idx and .ecd files. &nbsp;The SMATdb size is 206,908,416 bytes and the combined size of the resulting .msg, .idx and .ecd files is 206,158,596 bytes&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-5235"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/smatdb-disk-requirements-to-idx-requirements/#post-83766" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>