<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Tim Faul | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/tim-faul/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/tim-faul/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tim Faul.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 11:08:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">24fc50a31340f885cef867a9d0b2479c</guid>
				<title>Tim Faul replied to the topic 5.7 Client Compatibility with Windows 7 64-bit in the forum Operating Systems</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/5-7-client-compatibility-with-windows-7-64-bit/#post-80063</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:52 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a162a7233e35d945974414f20fa8b727</guid>
				<title>Tim Faul replied to the topic TCL vs XLATE in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/tcl-vs-xlate-2/#post-68072</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:52:02 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><s></p>
<p>Jim Kosloskey wrote:<br />
</s>Tim,</p>
<p>Xlate is fololowing the standard. Apparently your Tcl code is not.</p>
<p>The interesting part there is that it&#8217;s happening where I&#8217;m not coding it to make any changes to the message. I&#8217;ve converted a filter TCL into an Xlate.<br />
The TCL checked the patient type and continues or kills the messages, and I setup the Xlate to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9058"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/tcl-vs-xlate-2/#post-68072" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c4d3fd43965350914a02d95a05f888a4</guid>
				<title>Tim Faul replied to the topic another newbie question in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/another-newbie-question/#post-68012</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:28:44 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><s></p>
<p>Robert Milfajt wrote:<br />
</s><s></p>
<p>Quote:<br />
</s>Perhaps you can create a dummy ORU from the ADT (Xlate ADT to ORU)that will &#8216;seed&#8217; the receiving system so that the patient exists.<br />
Then the real ORU will post the result.</p>
<p>I like Jim&#8217;s idea here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2e42fbfc87089cbc16b657a750f655bb</guid>
				<title>Tim Faul replied to the topic Method or standard for selecting port numbers? in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/method-or-standard-for-selecting-port-numbers/#post-68040</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:20:57 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><s></p>
<p>Nate Kruse wrote:<br />
</s>We have no method. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">64fd46ffe5a7ca6cb2a94b97b35ce633</guid>
				<title>Tim Faul replied to the topic Upgrade from HPUX box to Linux? in the forum Operating Systems</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/upgrade-from-hpux-box-to-linux/#post-67795</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 17:19:47 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><s></p>
<p>Max Drown wrote:<br />
</s>You will NEVER regret switching to RedHat Linux. The cost savings alone are enormous. The OS is as stable as anything else out there. There are tons of out-of-the-box, non-proprietary tools included like all of the gnu tools. And what isn&#8217;t there already, is easy to install on RedHat. RedHat is an absolute dream to work&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9313"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/upgrade-from-hpux-box-to-linux/#post-67795" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>