Sandi Meyers

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Can I configure a 2.4 message to 2.5.1 #81442
    Sandi Meyers
    Participant

      Thank you Jim.  I will read this carefully.

      in reply to: https protocol #79860
      Sandi Meyers
      Participant

        Jim, I got the messages sent but the receiving side sent me this info that i have the header formatted incorrectly.

        ERROR Web.HL7I An error has occured in this ASHX page. Please contact Avanza support for assistance. (The ASHX page was not called with a ‘loginid’ form variable.)

        FATAL Web.HL7I The ASHX page was not called with a ‘loginid’ form variable.

        I didnt actually create a header.

        in reply to: https protocol #79859
        Sandi Meyers
        Participant

          Yes, that was it.  Thank you.

          in reply to: https protocol #79857
          Sandi Meyers
          Participant

            I used the tclcurl proc suggested from the post.  It ‘seems’ to have sent the messages but I am getting an error in my log.

            [ssl :clse:WARN/0:Immunizations_OB:02/17/2014 09:04:11] [0.0.3603364] Cannot OVER original OB message (yet)

            I have never seen that before.  Does anyone know what that would mean?

            in reply to: https protocol #79856
            Sandi Meyers
            Participant

              Thanks all, we are 5.7 and needed the SSL license.  Got that installed so I am on to the next step.  Looked at the link that was sent and going to try that tclcurl.  I will update when I work this out so maybe it will help someone else out.

              in reply to: HL7 2.5 messages #74171
              Sandi Meyers
              Participant

                McKesson is really going to 2.5 due to Meaningful Use requirements.  I do have some lower versions and was concerned about this.  Do I have to join the HL7 group to be able to download the documentation?

                in reply to: Field Size Increase #72811
                Sandi Meyers
                Participant

                  Thanks Jim. It worked.  So much easier.  We are upgrading to 5.7 so at least I can look when/if I need again and cant remember.

                  Again, Thank you so much.

                  in reply to: Changing MEssage Types #71277
                  Sandi Meyers
                  Participant

                    Thanks I thought of that but using the bulkcopy what of my other ADT messages?  The only ones they don’t accept are A31.  Still need all the others.

                    in reply to: Changing MEssage Types #71275
                    Sandi Meyers
                    Participant

                      tried that and still got an error.  Here are screen shots of the xlate and error

                      in reply to: Multiple choices for a suppression #70717
                      Sandi Meyers
                      Participant

                        here they are

                        in reply to: Multiple choices for a suppression #70715
                        Sandi Meyers
                        Participant

                          Sorry tried to type it that way and it doesnt work.  Getting “Extra characters” error.

                          in reply to: Multiple choices for a suppression #70713
                          Sandi Meyers
                          Participant

                            Do i type it just like that?  And will that screen for messages that are either x or y in PV1, 10?

                            in reply to: Changing Multiple OBRs to OBXs #69956
                            Sandi Meyers
                            Participant

                              I tried a separate message for each group with the CONTINUE option in an XLATE.  But it makes for very confusing group of messages.  In the clinical aspect it looks like there are more then one specimen being analyzed.

                              in reply to: Changing Multiple OBRs to OBXs #69953
                              Sandi Meyers
                              Participant

                                none that I know of yet.  I am getting all other messages/results across.  But the big problem seems to be micro messages when cultures have multiple organisms with susceptibilites.  My concern was when changing to OBX will the susceptility stay with the proper organism since all these will now be OBX segments.  The message for these come with OBR for the first organism and then mulitple OBX for susceptiblity results, then another OBR with more OBX results for that organism susceptibilty.  Sorry, I am a clinical person recruited to do interfacing.  Traing keeps getting postponed because I keep making it work but this has me stymied.

                                in reply to: Multiple OBR segments broke out to single messages #69700
                                Sandi Meyers
                                Participant

                                  I have some iterations for OBX and NTE within my OBR iterations, do I wnat to put the CONTINUE as the last action after all these?

                                  And why do I want a Suppress?

                                Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 27 total)