Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
Let’s hope in future releases they improve the statistics and reporting funcionalities and make them more reliabable.
Very good question as I’m struggling with the same problem.
There is no info in the Cloverleaf manuals on how to setup HA using MSCS and Redhat pacemaker cluster.
The need for active-passsive between 2 datacenters is a question we get from all our customers and unfortunately we don’t have a clear answer due to the lack of documentation provided by Infor.
<pre>very interested as well to know the possiblities</pre>
- This reply was modified 1 year, 2 months ago by Peter Cosman.
The release notes don’t mention OEL. I would also like to have OEL support for cloverleaf servers hosted on Oracle Cloud Infrastructure where Redhat isn’t supported.
Following as we have exactly the same question.
One additional: independently if using cloud or not, what other options than a classic 2-node cluster of HA exists? We have many clients and prospects that would like to build HA through load balancing but the actual technical design of Cloverleaf doesn’t seem to permit such type of HA.
Also very interested to know if there is an official supported way of doing this.
%V only gives me the current value, no datetime info.
Hi Rob,
Great news that the 20.1.1 patch is available (although I can’t find it on the download page).
But I’m surprised you are dropping Centos8 support for this patch. If the major version 20.1 is supported on Centos8 then patches for this same major version should not drop support for a OS that’s supported by the major version. Knowing that Centos8 will be EOL at the end of the year it’s logical that the next major version of Cloverleaf would drop support for Centos8 but not for a patch level of the current version.
We were planning to migrate our Centos8 systems to Redhat Linux 8 before the EOL of Centos8 but dropping support now for Centos8 with this much needed patch complicates a lot.
Regards,
Peter Cosman
I would say for sure Linux as it’s easier for your remote administration (through the cmd line utilities with SSH).
If you need ODBC then Windows would be cheaper as you don’t need the ODBC driver pack.
-
AuthorReplies