Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
Has anyone seen and issues with Client version 6.1.1 install on windows 10 specifically related to smatdb being really slow?
Works well. For me I have struggled with the old subtle changes in shading so this helps quite a bit. Great Job Alex.
June 29, 2015 at 4:48 pm in reply to: Anyone ever add an API Client or Web Service to their engine #80595Hi Terry,
I was just asked about Practice Fusion and if we could interface to them so some of the independent doctors in our area could submit orders and get results back. When I contacted their support they told me they couldn’t interface to cloverleaf which I think is baloney and apparently since you have I was correct in my assumption. Unfortunately I’m still stuck on windows server 2008 for the engine. Can you tell me what you had to do to get this connected? At this point I have only received an inquiry from administration into whether we could make this happen or not.
Thanks,
Nick Schneider
Kevin Scantlan wrote:No, you do not need advanced security.
Thanks for the response
Do you need to have advanced security for LDAP to work?
Hi all,
I have to send an email alert to a mailbox setup at a partner hospital and the box happens to be in a different domain than we normally send to. I’m told I need to setup a smarthost of some sort so the messages know where to go. I’m currently using the Tclmail 2.0 package on Windows 2008 R2. Does anyone know if this configuration of a smart host can be done under tclmail or if this is sendmail specific is there another solution?
Thanks,
Nick
That will do it. I don’t know why I didn’t think of that in the first place.
Thanks,
Nick
I have recently run into the problem where the firewall TCP/IP Idle timeout was occurring milliseconds before the vendor keep-alive was able to come across. Like others have mentioned and I have seen elsewhere my inbound thread thinks the vendor is still connected and refuses all connection attempts until the thread is bounced. I have been unable to get the Network groups on either end to address this so I went ahead and setup multi-server and have been able to get around this issue with one exception. I am not seeing the OS drop the abandoned connections. We are running CL 5.6 on Windows Server 2003. Does anyone know if there is a setting I need to change in order to have Windows recognize and release the abandoned connections before I write a proc to stop and start the process every so often? Sorry, I meant to reply a long time ago. I did contact support about Windows Updates and I was told they don’t keep a list. Do any of you out there that are running on Windows Server 2003 have and recommendations on how to best handle windows updates. Has anyone had any of the updates break anything?
I am going and I do know all 3 of them. I will chat with all of them about this. I think there would be enough interest if people knew about it. I for one knew there had been attempts at getting this to work in the earliest versions but I was under the impression that it was dropped a long time ago. Nick Schneider
Has anyone received an answer about version control working in the newer releases. Nick Schneider
After pouring through snifer traces I discovered exactly where this timeout was occurring. The app that was connecting to us would establish a socket connection send the beginning of block packet, we would then ACK that packet then the app would go out and format the message to be sent. This formatting is taking 18 seconds which is where the timeout occurs. Unfortunately like all projects we are always forced to figure out why the other end is broken. -
AuthorReplies