Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
A brief follow-up. This is mainly to those new to utilizing the jdbc process to query external databases. I won’t go through setting up the jdbc ‘tables’ used but rather on how to handle errors.
Cloverleaf – 19.1.2.2
We discovered that if there was a connection error, information would be written to the .err and/or .log. Nothing real-time was sent stating an error occurred. The message would still be sent, however the information might be missing or incorrect if based on the query result.
To remedy that we created an email tcl proc to check the built-in jdbc error flag of @tbl_errno. 0 [zero] is successful. -1 is an error condition. Greater than 0 means multiple rows were returned. So, if -1, we generate an email stating the error, with information needed for research, etc. We also created a tclproc to send the mesasge to the error database, and suppress it from being sent out.
The error database tcl uses: xpmerror xpmId severity message – to do the work. Fairly easy to work with.
With some expert help and guidance from Jim Kosloskey, I was able to get the xpmerror to work and send the message to the error database.
Thanks all!
August 17, 2020 at 3:45 pm in reply to: Create multible OBX-5 based on \.br\ in the original message #117642Thanks Debbie. That would be great.
Linux to Unix transfer. So Windows is out of the picture.
Well, here is the answer from Infor support:
We changed how we handled subcomponents in 6.0, then rolled it back in 6.0.1.
So that’s why you did not see it in 6.0 but you did in 6.0.2…
What the details or inner reasons why I do not know…but it seems it was by design.
Also I checked the 6.0.2 release notes and noticed that it’s stated in there as well.
“Rollback changes causes copying HL7 subcomponents behavior change (9548)”
Must have missed that comment in the release notes.
I would agree with the comment Jim, except I applied the patch several months earlier and encountered the same problem, and backed it out until I could research what needed to change in the Xlates.
We also had an instance where information in the OBX-5 was passing okay in the 6.0 version, but the embedded ‘&’ started causing issues with the patch. Luckily we know a quick workaround for the ampersand mapping.
July 8, 2015 at 6:32 pm in reply to: Easy way to stop the monitor daemons over multiple sites #82846Thanks Rob. Appreciate the examples.
Thanks Justin. Really was trying to discover the best practices and the easiest way to get it set up. Good information in you replay. I’ll bookmark it and ask away as I get things going.
Mike C.
What I did to make this work:
I added this to the script prior to the site specific processing needed:
setroot -clear
setroot /quovadx/cis6.0/integrator your_site_here
Then after processing, I reset to the site needed:
setroot -clear
setroot /quovadx/cis6.0/integrator your_primary_site
Seems to be working just fine.
March 25, 2015 at 4:42 pm in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82268Turned out James C. was correct after all.
I looked in one place that had the HL7 defined, but not the correct one.
So…limping for a while after the self-inflected shot-to-the-foot. 😳
March 24, 2015 at 11:20 am in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82267Thanks for the replies all. I’ve checked and double checked all those things mentioned. I finally bit the bullet and opened a point with Infor support. So far, they are at a loss as to what the issue is. I’ll post when we get it figured out.
March 23, 2015 at 1:39 pm in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82264I’ve checked that, re-copying and re-entering it.
It’s the same as production. And yes, the wild card box is checked. 🙂
I do like the TCP/IP thread pair idea.
So, on the SOURCE side, I am getting messages into the thread, and wanting to send those to the DESTINATION side.
My guess is I would use a RAW static_route configuration.
If correct, how do I get the DESTINATION [in a different site] to show up to connect to?
Might have to give you a call early next week.
Unless you can briefly explain what “OVER” looks like.
Thanks Jim. I AM using the Cloverleaf inter-site routing, or at least I’m trying to.
-
AuthorReplies