Mike Campbell

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 147 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: TCL to write message to the error database. #118890
    Mike Campbell
    Participant

      A brief follow-up.  This is mainly to those new to utilizing the jdbc process to query external databases.  I won’t go through setting up the jdbc ‘tables’ used but rather on how to handle errors.

      Cloverleaf – 19.1.2.2

      We discovered that if there was a connection error, information would be written to the .err and/or .log.  Nothing real-time was sent stating an error occurred.  The message would still be sent, however the information might be missing or incorrect if based on the query result.

      To remedy that we created an email tcl proc to check the built-in jdbc error flag of @tbl_errno.  0 [zero] is successful.  -1 is an error condition.  Greater than 0 means multiple rows were returned.  So, if -1, we generate an email stating the error, with information needed for research, etc.  We also created a tclproc to send the mesasge to the error database, and suppress it from being sent out.

      The error database tcl uses:  xpmerror xpmId severity message – to do the work.  Fairly easy to work with.

       

      in reply to: TCL to write message to the error database. #118885
      Mike Campbell
      Participant

        With some expert help and guidance from Jim Kosloskey, I was able to get the xpmerror to work and send the message to the error database.

        Thanks all!

        Mike Campbell
        Participant

          Thanks Debbie.  That would be great.

          mike.campbell@nmhs.org

          in reply to: Recover a binary file #84432
          Mike Campbell
          Participant

            Linux to Unix transfer.  So Windows is out of the picture.

            in reply to: Errors out of 6.0.2 Patch #82908
            Mike Campbell
            Participant

              Well, here is the answer from Infor support:

                 We changed how we handled subcomponents in 6.0, then rolled it back in 6.0.1.

                 

                 So that’s why you did not see it in 6.0 but you did in 6.0.2…

                 

              What the details or inner reasons why I do not know…but it seems it was by design.

              Also I checked the 6.0.2 release notes and noticed that it’s stated in there as well.

              “Rollback changes causes copying HL7 subcomponents behavior change (9548)”

              Must have missed that comment in the release notes.

              in reply to: Errors out of 6.0.2 Patch #82906
              Mike Campbell
              Participant

                I would agree with the comment Jim, except I applied the patch several months earlier and encountered the same problem, and backed it out until I could research what needed to change in the Xlates.  

                We also had an instance where information in the OBX-5 was passing okay in the 6.0 version, but the embedded ‘&’ started causing issues with the patch.  Luckily we know a quick workaround for the ampersand mapping.

                Mike Campbell
                Participant

                  Thanks Rob.  Appreciate the examples.

                  in reply to: Web services (CAA-WS) question #82460
                  Mike Campbell
                  Participant

                    Thanks Justin.  Really was trying to discover the best practices and the easiest way to get it set up.  Good information in you replay.  I’ll bookmark it and ask away as I get things going.  

                    Mike C.

                    in reply to: setsite question #82210
                    Mike Campbell
                    Participant

                      What I did to make this work:

                      I added this to the script prior to the site specific processing needed:

                      setroot -clear

                      setroot /quovadx/cis6.0/integrator your_site_here

                      Then after processing, I reset to the site needed:

                      setroot -clear

                      setroot /quovadx/cis6.0/integrator your_primary_site

                      Seems to be working just fine.

                      in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82268
                      Mike Campbell
                      Participant

                        Turned out James C. was correct after all.

                        I looked in one place that had the HL7 defined, but not the correct one.

                        So…limping for a while after the self-inflected shot-to-the-foot.   😳

                        in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82267
                        Mike Campbell
                        Participant

                          Thanks for the replies all.  I’ve checked and double checked all those things mentioned.  I finally bit the bullet and opened a point with Infor support. So far, they are at a loss as to what the issue is.  I’ll post when we get it figured out.

                          in reply to: Wild card messages aren’t working on multi-site config #82264
                          Mike Campbell
                          Participant

                            I’ve checked that, re-copying and re-entering it.

                            It’s the same as production.  And yes, the wild card box is checked.   🙂

                            in reply to: Inter-site setup #82165
                            Mike Campbell
                            Participant

                              I do like the TCP/IP thread pair idea.  

                              So, on the SOURCE side, I am getting messages into the thread, and wanting to send those to the DESTINATION side.  

                              My guess is I would use a RAW static_route configuration.

                              If correct, how do I get the DESTINATION [in a different site] to show up to connect to?

                              in reply to: Inter-site setup #82163
                              Mike Campbell
                              Participant

                                Might have to give you a call early next week.

                                Unless you can briefly explain what “OVER” looks like.

                                in reply to: Inter-site setup #82161
                                Mike Campbell
                                Participant

                                  Thanks Jim.  I AM using the Cloverleaf inter-site routing, or at least I’m trying to.

                                Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 147 total)