Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorReplies
-
Oops, it might have helped if I cycle saved the thread and not the process. Never mind 😳
Just my two cents, I just completed a pretty involved CASE with Lawson regarding transition from 5.6 to 5.8.5 I created the CASE as a level 3, and it took just shy of two hours for them to respond. Since it was a test enviroment project, I thought their response time was okay, not great. Keith, that did the trick, many thanks. Bill, thanks for replying. Well, I pasted that into the reg. expression window, but it didn’t find it. I’ll play around with it some more. Robert, thanks for your reply. Yeah, I think the X11 window is the issue. I’m running on a Windows 2003 server, and there isn’t an X server available.
I am about finished evaluating the upgrade of the same versions you are looking at. The only big thing I have found is that with 5.7, the tcl gdbm function has been replaced by sqlite. In the long run this is probably a good move, but I’m working with Lawson to develop a solution for a proc I have that is not working after the conversion to sqlite.
Gary, that is a really useful link thanks. Man, I am getting close, here is the string I have in my proc
db “insert into Insurance (Last name, DOB, Gender, MRN) VALUES (‘$pt’, ‘$birth’, ‘$sex’, ‘$pid’)”
I’m getting ‘S1000 -1811 {[Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Counld not find file ‘(unknown)’.}’
Guessing my command is not quite correct, any suggestions? The variables are fields I’ve pulled out of an ORM in the beginning of the proc.
The package appears to have installed. I went to Data Sources under Administrative settings to create a new DSN, but can’t see the tclodbc driver, which I assume should show up.
Gary, that appears to have worked, thanks a bunch!
thank you both for replying. Gary, the setup script changes the tcl version to 8.1, must be the release of the package I downloaded.
Levy, I think you may have hit it. I just Googled tclodbc, and downloaded the first one I found. I’ll try and find the binary.
With Jim K’s help, I was able to get this to work. I set up a field Interate, and on the source of the CONCAT action, I listed
1(0).1(0).0(0).OBR(0).#20(%f1).[0]
~1(0).0(0).0(0).DG1(0).#3(0).[0]
with a ^ Separator. In the Dest. I put
1(0).0(0).0(0).DG1(0).#3(0).[0]
What I get in DG1-3 is a reverse of OBR-20, but it should work.
Marcus, not sure if you can do it outside the thread. I search through the SMAT data using the .msg files.
That certainly sounds like the issue, thanks Rob
Thanks Robert, Jim the whizz Koslowski helped me work through it. I ended up using MATH ADD =1 $%s99 to $%s99 for both the group and segement iterate. The trick was zero ing out %s99, and on the segement interate, useing the engine counter, %s1 on the source, and my counter %s99 on the desination. Here is a screen shot
I concurr with David. The source port usually jumps all over the map. Filter on the IP address and port you are sending to. -
AuthorReplies