Lynda Chen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 6 replies – 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: SMATDB Message Order in 19.1.1 #118249
    Lynda Chen
    Participant

      It seems that it only sorts for a single SMATDB, but not when you’re using the SMAT Database tool across multiple files.

      Does anyone have a workaround/solution for that?

      in reply to: smat db enryption default key v19.1.1 #118140
      Lynda Chen
      Participant

        I have not found the site name to work. Is there a mixture of cases or any special characters added?

        in reply to: CL 6.0: subcomponent reference issue #79023
        Lynda Chen
        Participant

          Here are Notes added by R&D on 17 Dec 2014 09:27:41 :

          We plan to fix the trailing sep char handling in CIS6.1.1.0, after the fix, engine will remove these trailing sep chars as what it did before.

          The current behavior that cloverleaf handles component and subcomponent in tcl is the result of the HL7 subcomponent copy change. As mentioned, after the change, if user uses a component level address in COPY, cloverleaf will get the whole component content (not expand it into list), which is used for COPY source to solve the 5.8 copy issue.

          There are 2 workarounds here:

          1. Use sub-component level address as source in COPY

          2. Split the xlateInVals by sub-component sep char in tcl pre/post proc.

          Unfortunately, the new behavior is the base of the fix.

          in reply to: CL 6.0: subcomponent reference issue #79020
          Lynda Chen
          Participant

            FYI: Infor has accepted the issue of the trailing sep chars and will try to work on removing them.

            Another difference we noticed was:

            CL 5.8 engine passes components and subcomponents as a list to tclprocs.

            However, with CL 6.1 the engine continues to pass components as lists, but subcomponents as a string to tclprocs.

            in reply to: CL 6.0: subcomponent reference issue #79016
            Lynda Chen
            Participant

              We are working on upgrading from CL 5.8.7 to CL 6.1. Found that CL 6.1 is not removing trailing subcomponent separators even when empty.

              Thus in CL 5.8

              incoming: |Lastname^Firstname^MI^^^MD&&|

              outgoing from xlt with a copy: |Lastname^Firstname^MI^^^MD|

              in CL 6.1

              incoming: |Lastname^Firstname^MI^^^MD&&|

              outgoing from xlt with a copy: |Lastname^Firstname^MI^^^MD&&|

              in reply to: CL 6.0: subcomponent reference issue #79013
              Lynda Chen
              Participant

                Has Infor responded to this discovery with a fix by the CL 6.1 release?

              Viewing 6 replies – 1 through 6 (of 6 total)