<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Lonnie Wright | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/lonnie-wright/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/lonnie-wright/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Lonnie Wright.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 06:48:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">52e278f785d3e57766a90479730e4fa7</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76520</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:59:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to all of you for your help. &nbsp;</p>
<p>It turns out that the code that changed the facility field was on the sending system. &nbsp;The resend that they did the first time I tested with the hcitcptest was not sent through the normal path, so it was not changed. &nbsp;After running several tests that some of you recommended, I set up another hcitcptest and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16527"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76520" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6ed1758421284a47b70e61e4e4c2d207</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76516</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:30:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, sorry, you did say network trace in your message, I just missed it the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6178b27aa0ec7794fcd6a4ab70337fff</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76515</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:29:23 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,<br />
Good suggestion. &nbsp;I checked the site pdls directory when I first discovered the problem, but I had not thought of modifying the mlp_tcp.pdl to add an echo. &nbsp;I&#8217;ll change the name to be sure it gets the correct one.</p>
<p>John,<br />
Are you talking about a network trace? &nbsp;It seems that since the hcitcptest received the unmodified message, that the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16516"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76515" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b6efc4fc2ed00842c3117bff37e3b3aa</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76512</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 15:32:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ,<br />
This is happening in both the PROD and TEST which are run on 2 different AIX servers. &nbsp;The change is intentional because the routing script is set to use the modified facility. &nbsp;</p>
<p>There are no other interfaces on the system using the same port, I used netstat to verify this as well as a search of all of the NetConfigs on the server.</p>
<p>The&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16521"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76512" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fc7abe8fdf2f8e327a11d30ca238cc58</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76511</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:58:36 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you can see below, the change has been made before it reaches the SMS/IN_DATA proc.</p>
<p>This is what was sent:<br />
MSH|^~&amp;|MEDILINKS|ECLH|EMORY|ECLH|20120508070154||DFT^P03|837db85768f04f52901e5fdb0f132798|T|2.4<br />
EVN|P03|20120508070154|20120508070154<br />
PID|||6546546||SUAVE^RICO||19710303|M|||||( &nbsp; ) &nbsp;&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-14982"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76511" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1dc23b12052af4dd7b0f60f1a3d55b6e</guid>
				<title>Lonnie Wright replied to the topic Mismatch of message sent to message in SMAT in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/mismatch-of-message-sent-to-message-in-smat/#post-76508</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:15:49 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By TPS proc do you mean the SMS/in_data proc?</p>
<p>The protocol is pdl-tcpip.</p>
<p>Because of decisions made by our management, we are still running Cloverleaf 5.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>