<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Kathy Riggle | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/kathy-riggle/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/kathy-riggle/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Kathy Riggle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 21:28:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f3d4369999144fd7599c57faf608d0ea</guid>
				<title>Kathy Riggle replied to the topic Best to use a static route? in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/best-to-use-a-static-route/#post-68705</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:59:01 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth &#8211; I prefer to use wild card routing. I&#8217;d rather just send the messages that the specific receiver wants, than to use static routing, and have to kill messages that are not desired.</p>
<p>Kathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0146485fa87f09f46b261c5eadb3eed</guid>
				<title>Kathy Riggle replied to the topic General question about inbound vs outbound lab messaging in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/general-question-about-inbound-vs-outbound-lab-messaging/#post-59338</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 15:43:07 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer really depends on the lab vendor. If they can accept all different type of messages on one thread, and if they will send all message types on one outbound thread, you&#8217;re fine. Whether orders get routed to the reference lab or to one of the foreign labs, cloverleaf can handle that routing.</p>
<p>One thing to consider {a.k.a. &#8220;my two cents&#8221;}&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20094"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/general-question-about-inbound-vs-outbound-lab-messaging/#post-59338" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2dd46b40c31b41d1945c317fa1928531</guid>
				<title>Kathy Riggle replied to the topic static routepass through in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/static-routepass-through/#post-59278</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:56:53 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I couldn&#8217;t get out of doing it (is there really no other way to monitor?) then yes, what I would do is an &nbsp;_HCI_static_route_, raw.</p>
<p>Kathy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>