<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Karen May | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/karen-may/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/karen-may/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Karen May.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 22:09:53 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4626d8b2deafc0fd16e4a1f77b93fec4</guid>
				<title>Karen May replied to the topic PreXlate TCL Proc to Modify 1 Piece of an OBR  2.5.1 Variant in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/prexlate-tcl-proc-to-modify-1-piece-of-an-obr-2-5-1-variant/#post-83093</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 19:10:27 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim..</p>
<p>The only way to do filtering (I&#8217;ve already got a tps proc working) is based on the SectionID in OBR.24 which at present, comes in blank.. hence the other proc move to the preXlate stack. &nbsp;I&#8217;ll play with this more and see what I can come up with.</p>
<p>Karen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4420513d9fdea820816394a17643774f</guid>
				<title>Karen May replied to the topic PreXlate TCL Proc to Modify 1 Piece of an OBR  2.5.1 Variant in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/prexlate-tcl-proc-to-modify-1-piece-of-an-obr-2-5-1-variant/#post-83091</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:35:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim.. The reason I&#8217;ve gone the tps route is to avoid overhead in the engine. &nbsp;I originally set it up as a tcl frag inside the xlate and that worked out just fine untl we realized that Meditech is sending in three different formats requiring three different translations. &nbsp;I could still do it that way&#8230; It would be a whole lot quicker as I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-3323"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/prexlate-tcl-proc-to-modify-1-piece-of-an-obr-2-5-1-variant/#post-83091" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">521f93209b68b50c8f82d53b4fd1ece4</guid>
				<title>Karen May replied to the topic PreXlate TCL Proc to Modify 1 Piece of an OBR  2.5.1 Variant in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/prexlate-tcl-proc-to-modify-1-piece-of-an-obr-2-5-1-variant/#post-83089</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 17:34:04 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply Robert. &nbsp;I had found that last brace item. &nbsp;Given that I have to replace OBR.24 in ALL OBR segs, your suggestion to set a counter to keep track of where the proc is at each encounter is a prudent one.. I&#8217;ll give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a51ffd65a15e971b0b2b52f581dd0e9f</guid>
				<title>Karen May replied to the topic Crazy Mismatched IR Tags issue in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/crazy-mismatched-ir-tags-issue/#post-83065</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 11:33:38 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mike..</p>
<p>Typically per the HL7 2.3 standard; &nbsp;A01, A04, A05, A08, A13, A14 have the same structure. &nbsp;A09, A10 &amp; A11 use a slightly different structure, as do the A02, A03.</p>
<p>The format is structured according to the type of transaction being processed. &nbsp;ie; IN1 segments are not needed to transfer a patient from one bed to another with an A02.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-4169"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/crazy-mismatched-ir-tags-issue/#post-83065" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>