<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clovertech | Joe Sellers | Activity</title>
	<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/members/joe-sellers/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://clovertech.infor.com/members/joe-sellers/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Joe Sellers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 01:14:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1f1ca5d8a3b9e18febd3b7e895af73d9</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers&#039;s profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://clovertech.infor.com/activity/p/2921/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 14:29:55 -0500</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8baf926972ce835c30e711ea2a9d8580</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers replied to the topic 5.8 Java bug? (Client/Hostserver slow, Disconnections) in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/5-8-java-bug-client-hostserver-slow-disconnections/#post-80401</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2014 13:16:06 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ, could you elaborate on the problem you had when using interface ports in the ephemeral range on AIX? &nbsp;We&#8217;re running CL 5.8.4 on AIX 6100-06-01-1043 and occasionally have problems with slow GUI performance and no results returned from the GUI testing tools or database administrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a3ffee10fdd900ea88979fe4a819d9b9</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers replied to the topic Setting Up and &#034;OVER&#034; Thread in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/setting-up-and-over-thread/#post-80293</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:58:43 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim. &nbsp;Your sample, along with what I pieced together from a couple of other posts, did the trick. &nbsp;I now have this setup in test and am auditing the output.</p>
<p>As with anything, there are all kinds of &#8220;tweaks&#8221; possible, but the basic concept was accomplished with a TPS Outbound Data proc on the &#8220;middle&#8221; thread that creates a new message from&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1779"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/setting-up-and-over-thread/#post-80293" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f8e81afbd46cb3205f25f8d60cc2ca2</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers replied to the topic Setting Up and &#034;OVER&#034; Thread in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/setting-up-and-over-thread/#post-80291</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:33:16 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are on 5.8.6. &nbsp;In my testing with &#8220;chaining&#8221;, it appears to allow you to link multiple xlates together on one route. &nbsp;In my testing with &#8220;branching&#8221;, it appears to allow you to link multiple xlates together on the &#8220;pre-route&#8221; and then create separate &#8220;branch&#8221; routes to separate destinations, each utilizing the same or a different xlate.</p>
<p>My&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1952"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/setting-up-and-over-thread/#post-80291" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">775d447ae235861d5005dd743d8d709c</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers replied to the topic Inter-Siter Routing with Cloverleaf 5.8 in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/inter-siter-routing-with-cloverleaf-5-8/#post-75822</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:14:03 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks everyone for your help and suggestions. &nbsp;For simplicity&#8217;s sake, we&#8217;ve decided to go with the tried and true method of inter-site routing over TCP/IP via localhost:port combinations. &nbsp;With the desire to do additional routing and translation in the destination site, it seems as if we would be intorducing additional points of failure in the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-11865"><a href="https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/inter-siter-routing-with-cloverleaf-5-8/#post-75822" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">33797b53c95c475e308f57cba9d47d81</guid>
				<title>Joe Sellers replied to the topic Inter-Siter Routing with Cloverleaf 5.8 in the forum Cloverleaf</title>
				<link>https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/forums/topic/inter-siter-routing-with-cloverleaf-5-8/#post-75819</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:10:14 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, that makes perfect sense. &nbsp;That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m seeing in my testing too. &nbsp;Unfortunately, we were hoping ISR could be used to create the second scenario and reduce some of the load on the processor and NIC. &nbsp;Perhaps a future enhancment&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>