Clovertech

Jerry Hayes

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 8 replies – 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • June 21, 2010 at 5:05 pm in reply to: Disconnect in a PDL? #71828
    Jerry Hayes
    Participant

      Well, no luck in trying anything at the PDL level, so I ended up moving the HTTP response generation to a TPS proc, and wrote that out similar to an HL7 ACK/NAK, (but with a HTTP 200/404 instead).

      I had to push things here so that I could use the “disconnect after write” option on the TCP/IP PDL dialog.

      June 16, 2010 at 4:50 pm in reply to: Known Issues upgrading from 5.5 to 5.7 #71716
      Jerry Hayes
      Participant

        We just did a 5.5 to 5.7 upgrade.  Issues:

        1. Default date precision is ON in 5.5 and OFF in 5.7.  Our data compare process required us to write a utility to add precision ON in 5.7 translates (that didn’t already have precision set), and fix a few TCL files with the convert_date procedure (which uses the same precision internally).

        2. The new RAIMA configuration wouldn’t let us continue to count recovery/error records more quickly with the keydump utility.  We had to switch these to use hcidbdump.

        We had a variety of other small issues that depend on specific implementation details, but those were the largest factors.

        As a side note, we expected the RAIMA to be corruption free, but were still able to induce corruption in power-off setting, (not using HA). This was able to be triggered even in VMWare (which we use for our failover/etc.).

        Hope this helps, feel free to PM me if you need any more discussion. Our implementation covers about 250+ threads.

        Jerry

        March 8, 2010 at 8:14 pm in reply to: Raima keydump on version 5.7 #70978
        Jerry Hayes
        Participant

          Jim,

          Our existing process uses this because it’s going through one less layer.

          I have no problem switching to hcidbidump, but I’m more concerned about something in the CL 5.7 version that doesn’t work as the CL 5.5 version; as we evaluate our new upgraded environment, we want to know what’s causing the discrepancy.

          Thanks,

          Jerry

          February 9, 2010 at 5:47 pm in reply to: Version 5.7 on 32 or 64 bit Red Hat? #70775
          Jerry Hayes
          Participant

            Done; Thanks Max.

            February 8, 2010 at 12:18 pm in reply to: Questions on upgrading 5.5 to 5.7 #70646
            Jerry Hayes
            Participant

              Max,

              Could you share a little about what version you upgraded from and the benefits you have realized with Cloverleaf 5.7?

              Thanks,

              Jerry

              February 1, 2010 at 2:15 pm in reply to: Questions on upgrading 5.5 to 5.7 #70643
              Jerry Hayes
              Participant

                Thanks Max!

                January 27, 2010 at 2:38 pm in reply to: Questions on upgrading 5.5 to 5.7 #70636
                Jerry Hayes
                Participant

                  Should’ve been posted in the Cloverleaf forum. Sorry for the double post.

                  December 22, 2009 at 10:19 pm in reply to: Any interest in Cloverleaf training in Orlando Florida? #69467
                  Jerry Hayes
                  Participant

                    Refreshing the request here…

                    Anyone interested in Cloverleaf training courses in Orlando, FL in February 2010.  We’re planning (minimum) levels I/II.  Possibly level III if interest.

                    Questions or comments to Gerald.Hayes@flhosp.org

                    Thanks all,

                    Jerry hayes

                  • Author
                    Replies
                  Viewing 8 replies – 1 through 8 (of 8 total)