Goran Djuranovic

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 replies – 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Sequential vs. Simultaneous processing #57867
    Goran Djuranovic
    Participant

      Jim Kosloskey wrote:

      My .02 worth…

      Ideally you would want one system to be the system of ‘truth’ for certain data (say the person’s address) and ignore transactions for that data from other systems. Jim Kosloskey


      Not a bad idea. At least some of the data processing could be set up like that, if not all.

      Thanks

      Goran

      in reply to: Sequential vs. Simultaneous processing #57866
      Goran Djuranovic
      Participant

        Greg,

        Before I comment on your reply, let me first expand on what I said before. The application is actually going to be a service. So, roughly explained, the service is envisioned to be only a handler of XML files (plus error, log, and message handler). It simply watches the folder for new files, and as soon as the file is found (exported from CloverLeaf), it is picked up, validated, and sent to SQL server’s stored procedures. Then, the stored procedures process (update, insert, delete, etc.) records (one by one) from the file, and therefore, are responsible for locking the record being processed.

        From the above, you can see that the service is not the problem. Basically, it can pick and send 50,000-record XML file in couple of seconds, but the stored procs will take a lot of time to process.

        As for the locking, I was affraid you were going to mention that

        in reply to: Intro to XML course – URGENT #57552
        Goran Djuranovic
        Participant

          I found out that the course is about XML in general.

          GD

        Viewing 3 replies – 1 through 3 (of 3 total)