David Speare

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: High Availability On Azure Hosted #120892
    David Speare
    Participant

      Good morning Peter,

       

      The biggest challenge looks like over coming the fact that you data disk isn’t replicated (that’s how I am reading the attached) which means that an organization has to either accept

      1. at an automatic failover your data disks will not be in sync (i.e. smat, logs etc) which could be an issue if you want to validate no data loss
      2. failovers are not automatic, but manual events where your data disk is detached from the passive and moved to the soon to be active server
      3. put a strategy in place to keep you data disks in sync (i.e. when a message is received, before it is ack’d back to the sender push it over to to your passive node and when you get that ack, you ack back to the sender)

       

      Doesn’t seem like any of these solutions are ideal.

      Attachments:
      You must be logged in to view attached files.
      in reply to: creating new set up using PROTOCOL:http-client #118476
      David Speare
      Participant

        You have no tcp/ip threads at all.  Is that you mean?

         

        in reply to: json iterate #118179
        David Speare
        Participant

          Guys thanks so much.  It was partly my json config and partially my xlate reference.

          Going to spell it out here in case anyone else comes across it (supporting images attached).

          procedures node –> type: array, element mode: tuple

          (0) –> type object

          setid –> type: string

          proccode –> type: array; element mode: tuple

          (0) –> type: object

          proccodeid –> type: string

          Attachments:
          You must be logged in to view attached files.
          in reply to: json iterate #118177
          David Speare
          Participant

            Thanks Boris!  That makes sense, would you share a screenshot of your json config?  Specifically are your common_order and ordering_provider elements both arrays?

            in reply to: Sybolic Link to Tclprocs #86328
            David Speare
            Participant

              Image attached

              in reply to: Sybolic Link to Tclprocs #86326
              David Speare
              Participant

                It’s the entire directory.  I can’t even use the gui to create a new tcl file without getting the permission error.

                in reply to: Call xlate from TCL #85240
                David Speare
                Participant

                  I was thinking about that.  Maybe setting the hcixlttest to a variable and pass in [msgget $mh].  We will see if that works.

                  in reply to: TPS Inbound Reply #85161
                  David Speare
                  Participant

                    I can’t even get a simple ACK reply to route.  sl_soap_test is sending in an ACK message to dl_soap_test.  I have a raw static REPLY route on dl_soap_test to conn_1.  However, even this simple config is getting a:

                    [xlt :rout:ERR /0:multi2_tst_xlate:05/17/2017 10:44:32] No routes defined for TrxId ”

                    I’m using hl7_Raw_ack to generate the ack message.

                    Do I HAVE to do something with TPS Inbound Reply?  What if I just want to take what I receive and put it somewhere else?

                    in reply to: Thank you Jim Koslosski #79432
                    David Speare
                    Participant

                      This post is very kind of old and I found it as I was just looking over the forum.  Jim helped me several times over the years, he even gave me a direct number to call him before.  His generosity of knowledge sharing is a benchmark for this community.

                      in reply to: 6.1 Message Search #85077
                      David Speare
                      Participant

                        So here is an update in case someone else experiences this:

                        There is a difference from selecting the SMAT database file from the Site Manager pane and selecting SMAT Database from the launch Bar.  If I select SMAT database and navigate to my SMAT db file my search capabilities function as I expect them to.

                        Very unusual.  Can anyone repeat this on their system?

                        in reply to: AIX – Hello world #85063
                        David Speare
                        Participant

                          Don’t see what I’m missing here:[/img]

                          in reply to: Bi-Weekly Alerts #85048
                          David Speare
                          Participant

                            you could script the alert to load whenever you wanted.

                            in reply to: Put $mh back into recovery database #82147
                            David Speare
                            Participant

                              Both thoughts are valid and I’ll test the first idea out.

                              For the moment, I’m dropping the incoming message – if it is to be reprocessed – to a file and have an identical filesetlocal thread picking it up and processing it.  this is taking a little longer than i’d like, but it’s doing the trick.

                              in reply to: Put $mh back into recovery database #82144
                              David Speare
                              Participant

                                TPS IB

                                it happens right after my ack

                                in reply to: Put $mh back into recovery database #82142
                                David Speare
                                Participant

                                  FTR – i’ve omitted the actual message, it’s there on my msgdump

                                Viewing 15 replies – 1 through 15 (of 24 total)