[Duy Nguyen]

Femina Jaffer wrote:

Hello,

Can someone help me with an iteration.

[Duy Nguyen]

It looks like they are still placing a 0D0A in between segments!  I will get back with them…

[Duy Nguyen]

Jim Kosloskey wrote:

So far we have 3 for Golf on Friday:

Me, Tom Rioux, and Torfinn.

If anyone else would like to join us please let me know by Monday Aug 30th., 2010. Feel free to email me directly

I will use individual email to communicate the arrangements so as not to clutter up the forum.

If I only knew how to play… 🙂

[Duy Nguyen]

I’m not quite sure why it works now but all I did was remove the code from the PRE-TCL window, saved the file, re-pasted it into the window, and now it works!

[Duy Nguyen]

Max Drown wrote:

I do it like this:

Code:

set tmp [string trimleft [lindex $xlateOutVals 0]]; set xlateOutVals [list $tmp]

Remember that xlateInVals and xlateOutVals are lists.

That didn’t seem to work either.  I’m curious if it is something else.  I assume that I can rule it out because when I DEACTIVATE the COPY command, the field does not get copied.  And it is empty.  So when I REACTIVATE the command, the field is present.  

And the leading white space is still present.  This is where I put in the TCL fragment, save the xlate, and rerun it through the XLT testing tool without any success.

[Duy Nguyen]

Thanks for all the great responses everyone.  🙂

[Duy Nguyen]

Thanks everyone..I got it to work.  =)

[Duy Nguyen]

Robert Kersemakers wrote:

Hi Mike,

Good to hear that your problem is solved.

And I hadn’t noticed that you were talking about the SMAT files (msg and idx); thought you were trying to cycle the log files (log and err). So my advice concerned the log files, not the SMAT files.

Sorry for the confusion.

Is there a way within Cloverleaf to have the SMAT files automatically cycled?  Thanks.

[Duy Nguyen]

Robert Kersemakers wrote:

Hi Mike,

Good to hear that your problem is solved.

And I hadn’t noticed that you were talking about the SMAT files (msg and idx); thought you were trying to cycle the log files (log and err). So my advice concerned the log files, not the SMAT files.

Sorry for the confusion.

Is there a way within Cloverleaf to have the SMAT files automatically cycled?  Thanks.

[Duy Nguyen]

Well the source of the problem was at the end of my IF statement. (pointed out by a fellow Cloverleafer  🙂 )

I had moved my begin bracket ” { ” to the next line and TCL complained.

[Duy Nguyen]

I’ve tried testing this in the TCL mode at the command line and of course it works.  But when I go back to the testing tool, I’m getting this whenever I execute the TCL proc against my LENGTH ENCODED FILE (created from SMAT):

Please Wait ……

Command Issued: hcitpstest -r run -f len10 -c sms_ib_data -e “hcitpstestshowbydisp ” e:/quovadx/qdx5.4.1/integrator/okprod2/roust-rad-no.len “only_roust_admed”

Command output:

[0:TEST] Tcl error:

msgId = message0

proc = ‘only_roust_admed’

args = ”

result = ‘wrong # args: no script following “{[string equal $condition1 true] && [string equal ” argument’

errorInfo: ‘

wrong # args: no script following “{[string equal $condition1 true] && [string equal ” argument

   while compiling

“if {[string equal $condition1 true] && [string equal $condition2 true]}”

   (“run” arm line 49)

   invoked from within

“switch -exact — $mode {

       start {

           # Perform special init functions

   # N.B.: there may or may not be a MSGID key in args

      …”

   (procedure “only_roust_admed” line 6)

   invoked from within

“only_roust_admed {MSGID message0} {CONTEXT sms_ib_data} {ARGS {}} {MODE run} {VERSION 3.0}”‘

I’m really frustrated because I believe it’s syntatically correct and I think everyone said the logic looks correct as well.  Anything I might have overlooked?  TIA.

[Duy Nguyen]

Thanks for all the prompt replies everyone.  I will have a go at it again today using everyone’s input and testing tips.  =)

[Duy Nguyen]

Charlie Bursell wrote:

Good point but it also something an individual can do.

[Duy Nguyen]

John Hamilton wrote:

The 00934 item can repeat some number of times.

When you have the (0) on the end your are telling it to work only only on the first field.

[Duy Nguyen]

Alright, I think I have it working now.

[Author]

Replies