William Grow

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 replies – 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Force 19.1 to use SMAT file not SMAT DB #120404
    William Grow
    Participant

      Does not appear to be an option under server administrator at least on 19.1 with Windows.  I am aware of that direction e, but there are other scripts that run that depend on the smat files at least for now.

      William Grow
      Participant

        After it gets to the inbound queue of thread B it would be routed through an existing route/translate from that thread to an outbound protocol thread that sends to a downstream ancillary system.

        William Grow
        Participant

          I tried using OVER. It seemed to result in an infinite loop and that seems to line up with the protocol thread disposition state action for OVER. The configuration is described below.

          Thread A

          • TCP/IP MLLP client protocol thread sending to Foreign System (FS)
          • Ack from foreign system contains additional data
          • Would like to place a new msg on IB queue of thread B

          Thread B

          • TCP/IP MLLP server protocol thread that routes data to Hospital Ancillary System (HAS)
          • Not listening or connected in any way in the engine to Thread A

           

          A   — — — TCP/IP  — — — — ->  FS

          A  <– — —  ACK  — — — — — –  FS

          B ——— Update ————> HAS

           

          Goal:

          Place msg created via msgcreate on IB queue of thread A. Understand that this is not standard but trying to work inside a design constraint.

          set new_mh [msgcreate -meta [subst {SKIPXLT 0 USERECOVERDB 1 SOURCECONN B ORIGSOURCECONN B USERECOVERDB 1}] “THIS IS DATA”]

          lappend dispList “OVER $new_mh”

          Attachments:
          You must be logged in to view attached files.
          William Grow
          Participant

            No, I did not. Let me try that with different values. Thank you.

            William Grow
            Participant

              Thank you Peter. That answered my question perfectly. I am unable to alter or modify any part of the DB schema. Your response indicates that for what I am trying to do, I may be better off at this time using the traditional approach (TCL).

            Viewing 5 replies – 1 through 5 (of 5 total)