Belinda Sams

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 9 replies – 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: CL6 PURGE CACHES, REINDEX, RELOAD COMMANDS #84300
    Belinda Sams
    Participant

      What is TioLoad? I’ve never heard of that. We are trying to find a way to cycle in table changes without causing a disruption in service. I know cycling a process only takes seconds but it’s still considered a disruption in service. That’s one reason we were looking at purge cache, but it sounds like that still isn’t very reliable. Any ideas?

      in reply to: CL6 PURGE CACHES, REINDEX, RELOAD COMMANDS #84291
      Belinda Sams
      Participant

        Is there anyway to do purge caches from the command line or does it have to be done via the GUI?

        I’m also hearing that there have been lots of problems with this function in the past. Is there any kind of proof that it is stable now?

        in reply to: Epic http interface to Cloverleaf #80590
        Belinda Sams
        Participant

          So after changing the port twice I decided to try a different protocol, http: client. I got a connection but the message errored. Attached is the message and error.

          in reply to: Epic http interface to Cloverleaf #80589
          Belinda Sams
          Participant

            We have the listener defined in the config file but maybe something is off there. At least I confirmed my setup looks good. I will ask Epic to look at the config file again. Maybe they missed something.

            in reply to: Epic http interface to Cloverleaf #80587
            Belinda Sams
            Participant

              We have it setup as TCP/IP, it still will not connect. Attached is my setup.

              in reply to: Epic http interface to Cloverleaf #80584
              Belinda Sams
              Participant

                I’m currently trying to connect Cloverleaf to Interconnect and not having much luck. I’m stuck at an opening state and my TS doesn’t know what the issue is on the Epic side. We have tried changing the ports once already and it didn’t work. How did others get this to work? What were your settings? Maybe I goofed up there. Thanks.

                in reply to: Combine 2 messages in post proc so only have 1 HL7 message #66333
                Belinda Sams
                Participant

                  I will get some examples together of the incoming message, what it looks like after going through the translate, and then what I need it to look like in order to post in the downstream system.

                  in reply to: Combine 2 messages in post proc so only have 1 HL7 message #66331
                  Belinda Sams
                  Participant

                    I accomplished the one message with different counters to duplicate segments to make the necessary modifications. The problem is getting the OBRs grouped with the right OBXs at the bottom of all of the OBXs that should be text. So for example

                    OBX|1|TX|

                    OBX|2|TX|

                    OBX|3|TX|

                    OBR|1|

                    OBX|1|ST|

                    OBX|2|ST|

                    OBR|2|

                    OBX|1|ST|

                    OBX|2|ST|

                    OBX|3|ST|

                    OBR|3|

                    Does this make sense? If it is possible to do it with an outbound TCL I need some guidence on that one please. I do not even know where to start.

                    in reply to: Combine 2 messages in post proc so only have 1 HL7 message #66329
                    Belinda Sams
                    Participant

                      The way it will work is a singe R01 will come through and hit 2 different translates. The text translate is first followed by the susceptibility translate. I do not think there is a way to guarantee that one will be there before the other; I’m not 100% sure though.

                      The message has to go through the two differnet translates because of the different code. I could combine everything into one translate but that brings up a different issue of making sure the outbound message still looks like the attached message.

                      Which way do you think would work best?

                    Viewing 9 replies – 1 through 9 (of 9 total)