Searching the new SMAT Database in 6.1

Clovertech Forums Read Only Archives Cloverleaf Cloverleaf Searching the new SMAT Database in 6.1

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #54563
    Danny Wheeler
    Participant

      In 5.8.5 using the SMAT tool I was able to whittle away at the view until I had only what I wanted.  How is everyone searching the SMAT database tool?

      Use case:

      I need to find every transaction in the SMAT database that is an OMG and contains the MR# 000001.

      In the previous SMAT tool I would search for the MRN in regex then remove if not OMG.

      Is there a way to do this with a regex?  What is the recommended way to do a search like this?

    Viewing 18 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • #81977
        Danny Wheeler
        Participant

          So many views and no replies is disheartening.  It tells my either I am the only one having this issue or no one has found a working solution yet.  I really like the SMAT Database tool but this would be a huge step back.

        • #81978
          Mark Thompson
          Participant

            Hi Danny,

            According to the 6.1 Release Notes …

            Because SQLite does not have built-in support for RegEx, this has been added so that the IDE can query smat_msgs.messagecontent using RegEx queries.

            I haven’t seen it in action yet, but hope to soon.

            - Mark Thompson
            HealthPartners

          • #81979

            Currently, you’ll need to use regular expressions. Searching will be much easier in Cloverleaf 6.1.1.

            -- Max Drown (Infor)

          • #81980
            Peter Heggie
            Participant

              Can you tell us more about 6.1.1?

              Infor support says you cannot delete ‘rows’ from the SQLite tables (in order to create a rolling 24 hour window of messages). I expect also that there is no easy way to select messages and insert them into another SQLite database that is viewable by the SMAT Viewing Utility.

              So we are stuck with cycle saving them, and if we want to look back 24 hours, we have to adjust te cycle save, or change the backup / compression scripts. We may have to hold off on compressing the backups for a longer period of time and then use the SMAT database selection criteria to select the backup smat databases (perhaps in the SmatHistory folder). But that might be ok. The tool is supposed to allow you to search through multiple smat databases (I think).

              Peter Heggie

            • #81981

              I can’t tell you anything about CIS 6.1.1 yet. Details should be released soon. I will say that SMAT DB searching is *greatly * enhanced.

              You will not be able to to modify the SMAT DB, especially since the ultimate goal is for the database to be encrypted to support HIPPA’s “data at rest” requirements. However, you can dump contents from the database and reuse the data.

              Yup, you can search across files using SMAT DB search. Cycling at a specific time should not be necessary any more, but instead cycle on file size thresholds and then search across files. Requests have been made to add cycling on a schedule.

              -- Max Drown (Infor)

            • #81982
              Rob Lindsey
              Participant

                Since we have not gotten a copy of version 6.1 to test with yet, I need to ask a question.

                Is Infor/Cloverleaf suggesting that there be only a single db file per interface and that single file keep the entire archive of the data flow in that single db?

                We keep at least 45 days on the system to be able to do searches for historical reasons.  Just on one of our interface we have over 10 million messages over a 45 day period.  The size of the data for those messages is a bit over 19 GB.  

                Is Infor suggesting that the entire interface be kept in a single DB and that it will be efficient with inserts happening at the same time as selects?

                I believe that most sites that use cloverleaf do a cycle save each night or through out the day to be able to save off historical data.  This just a different way of doing things that a lot of people have been used to for many many years (in my case over 15 years).

              • #81983
                Yves Guerin
                Participant

                  Dear,

                  We do a cycling of the data for every inbound interfaces and some time outbound too.  We keep in the engine around 3 months of data (in separate directories) and we perfomed a backup every month of the data to dvd (around 3.5 G disk space for messages: .idx and .msg files).  I am wondering about the space that the db file will take on disk ?  Will we able to purge or save the db file as we did with the flat data file (.idx and .msg) and keep only 3 months on the engine and backup the rest (older than 3 months) to dvd ?

                  Regards,

                  Yves

                • #81984

                  The SMAT DB files are configured in the NetConfig the same way that the SMAT files are configured, one per thread. With the flat files, unique file names were required. With SMAT DB, you have the option to point multiple threads at the same SMAT DB file.

                  You can continue to use external cycling scripts (UPoC advanced scheduling, cron, and scheduled jobs) to do whatever you are already doing like cycling on a time schedule. Currently, the built-in auto-cycling function only cycles on file size.

                  I would encourage you, where possible, to consider re-working your cycling methodology to take advantage of the built-in capabilities because this will be far easy to manage, make migrations significantly easier, and will leverage the SMAT DB search across files functions.

                  -- Max Drown (Infor)

                • #81985
                  Yves Guerin
                  Participant

                    Dear,

                    We still running cis.5.8

                    Regards,

                    Yves

                  • #81986
                    Bob Richardson
                    Participant

                      Greetings,

                      Max, is there a published general availability for 6.1.1?  We are now running 6.1.0 on AIX but kept on the legacy option for SMAT files for now pending an evaluation of the SMAT DB option.

                      We are signed up for the Winter Showcase in March to be held locally in St. Paul, Minnesota (3/23 thru 3/26).   At that event you will be showcasing the 6.1.1 (3/25).

                      I urge other customers to check if INFOR is planning a showcase event near you!

                      Thanks.

                    • #81987

                      Not yet. Rob will post on Clovertech as soon as it’s available. I suspect the first part half of this year, maybe even the first quarter. It is in beta 1 now.

                      -- Max Drown (Infor)

                    • #81988
                      Danny Wheeler
                      Participant

                        If regular expression is the only way currently how would that be achieved.  I can’t seem to find any way to do a “AND” comparison in regex.  If I wanted messages with “12345” MR# and “EMS” service how would that be achieved?  I know I can do a “OR” and match if either item occurs.  How do you match only if both occur?

                      • #81989

                        If it was me, I’d dump the first search to a file and then do a second search using grep. Or dump all of the messages to a file and use grep for all conditions.

                        With the tool, it won’t be as accurate I don’t think, not having seen your data. You’ll have to do something like VALUE1.*?VALUE2.

                        -- Max Drown (Infor)

                      • #81990
                        Danny Wheeler
                        Participant

                          Below is an example.  I want to match messages where the MSH.9.0 is “ADT” and PID.3.0 is “12345”.  I don’t want the first message to match.  But I do want the second message to match.  I also don’t want to match message 3.

                          MSH|^~&|SOARFCHARGES|SMMC|CAC|PRECYSE|201502150522||ORM^A08||P|2.7

                          EVN|A08|201502150522

                          PID|1||12345||********||*******|||||||||||117776880|********

                          PV1|1|||||||||OPS||||||||ER|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||474952.10

                          MSH|^~&|SOARFCHARGES|SMMC|CAC|PRECYSE|201502150528||ADT^A08||P|2.7

                          EVN|A08|201502150528

                          PID|1||12345||********||*******|||||||||||117876573|********

                          PV1|1|||||||||OPS||||||||ER|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||634916.00

                          MSH|^~&|SOARFCHARGES|SMMC|CAC|PRECYSE|201502150528||DFT^A08||P|2.7

                          EVN|A08|201502150528

                          PID|1||12345||********||*******|||||||||||117876573|********

                          PV1|1|||||||||OPS||||||||ER|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||00.00

                        • #81991

                          Try something like this: ADT.*?12345

                          -- Max Drown (Infor)

                        • #81992
                          James Cobane
                          Participant

                            Here at HFHS, we cycle the current (5.8.5) SMAT files nightly and keep a weeks worth available for trouble-shooting/research.

                          • #81993
                            Danny Wheeler
                            Participant

                              That REGEX worked for what I needed.  Thanks Max!

                            • #81994

                              I checked with R&D on this. Here’s their response,

                              We can do

                              -- Max Drown (Infor)

                            • #81995
                              Danny Wheeler
                              Participant

                                Great!  Thank you for following up on this!  I have been using the regex you gave me earlier to fit my needs in the meantime.

                            Viewing 18 reply threads
                            • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.