multiple server protocol license

Homepage Clovertech Forums Read Only Archives Cloverleaf Cloverleaf multiple server protocol license

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #48184
    Jim Kosloskey
    Participant

    All,

    I am trying to determine if we have the license key activated for the multiple server TCP/IP protocol.

    I see this in the license.dat file:

    FEATURE cl-aom-server-socket …

    But I don’t think that is the license for multiple server protocol.

    How can I tell if it is licensed? Is there a way I can tell outside of interpreting the license.dat file?

    CL 5.2P2 AIX

    Thanks,

    Jim Kosloskey

    email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • Author
    Replies
    • #57930
      Mark Thompson
      Participant

      Jim,

      “FEATURE cl-aom-server-socket …” is what was added to my license file when I requested the multiple-server feature.  Works pretty slick for applications that don’t always close their connections cleanly, then want to reconnect.  We added a check on the inbound IP address to prevent test applications from connecting to an “open” port on production.

      - Mark Thompson
      HealthPartners

    • #57931
      Jim Kosloskey
      Participant

      Mark,

      Thanks. I took a chance that was it and defined a test for multi server.

      It seemed to work so I then assumed the license key I described was correct.

      Your response helps confirm that.

      Jim Kosloskey

      email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

    • #57932
      Tijen Ireland
      Participant

      Mark Thompson wrote:

      Jim,

      “FEATURE cl-aom-server-socket …” is what was added to my license file when I requested the multiple-server feature.

    • #57933
      Jim Kosloskey
      Participant

      Tijen,

      I am not sure you can prevent the connection. I think all you can do is to KILL any messages from an unwanted connection. Perhaps alert someone via Page/Email that messages were being received from an unwanted connectio; perhaps even return an agreed upon acknowledgment indicating a problem.

      I think if you want to control who connects to Cloverleaf you will need to deploy a firewall – after all that is what they are for.

      Jim Kosloskey

      email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

    • #57934
      Mark Thompson
      Participant

      Jim is exactly right.  Each time an application connects to multi-server it recieves an new connection ID (connid).  We wrote a TPS proc that checks the connid of inbound messages.  If the TCP/IP address (actually the hostname) of the TCP/IP message matches a table entry for the thread we allow the message to continue.  If not, we kill the message and e-mail our support staff.

      Since many of our applications “refresh” their test configuration from production, we were concerned about test applications attempting to connect to production engine ports.

      - Mark Thompson
      HealthPartners

Viewing 4 reply threads
  • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.

Forum Statistics

Registered Users
5,117
Forums
28
Topics
9,292
Replies
34,432
Topic Tags
286
Empty Topic Tags
10