Hello,
Wanted to ask the community if there are any specific standards followed when looking at the size of Cloverleaf sites i.e. X amount of threads or processes determines when to split a site or if it’s dependent on a site volume or maybe both. Is there any recommendation to how many threads per process that determines when a process should be split out into multiple processes. Below is a break down of sites with threads/process count curious to hear what conventions other health systems follow in this regard.
| epicf1 | 137 | 18 |
| ewd | 123 | 43 |
| cac | 119 | 39 |
| epict1 | 115 | 17 |
| seo | 101 | 29 |
| smd | 99 | 30 |
| sae | 95 | 29 |
| theradoc | 86 | 6 |
| sjst1 | 80 | 25 |
| emrc | 72 | 13 |
| epicadt1 | 70 | 7 |
| sjsf1 | 70 | 24 |
| wwd | 68 | 23 |
| sfl | 67 | 20 |
| ephi | 56 | 26 |
| emra | 53 | 18 |
| emrdfh | 52 | 14 |
| pyxis | 50 | 14 |
| hshs | 50 | 15 |
| dbmtn | 49 | 14 |
| lab | 49 | 13 |
| sjcf | 48 | 15 |
| sjb | 48 | 15 |
| sjh | 43 | 16 |
| sjst2 | 42 | 14 |
| gss | 41 | 13 |
| imaging | 39 | 11 |
| shect1 | 38 | 11 |
| pos | 32 | 4 |
| hfg | 32 | 8 |
| conversion | 31 | 17 |
| shecf1 | 29 | 12 |
| epicsynd | 28 | 10 |
| trans | 26 | 7 |
| sns | 24 | 9 |
| labhist | 23 | 8 |
| sql_lite | 23 | 9 |
| emrbg | 22 | 11 |
| onbase | 22 | 6 |
| vituity | 21 | 3 |
| cid | 18 | 7 |
| svgb | 15 | 7 |
| atlas | 15 | 5 |
| ephny | 14 | 5 |
| medgrp | 14 | 5 |
| accumen | 12 | 4 |
| empi | 10 | 3 |
| unipoc | 10 | 5 |
| sid | 10 | 4 |
| emrie | 9 | 3 |
| scottcr | 8 | 4 |
| sco | 7 | 3 |
| idph | 6 | 2 |
| ccd | 6 | 6 |
| smgb | 4 | 2 |
| riskmgt | 4 | 2 |
| prov | 4 | 2 |
| myrnding | 4 | 2 |
| chgconv | 2 | 1 |