I got sent on a wild goose chase myself when I had to do an allergy integration using an HL7 2.3 ADT^A60 which doesn’t exist.
I pointed out to the vendor that there was no ADT^A60 message type for HL7 2.3 and first thought the vendor made up that message type.
They kept saying what do you mean there is no HL7 2.3 ADT^A60.
I also questioned why they were using already allocated item numbers inconsistantly then finally I discovered HL7 2.4 does have an ADT^A60 and so does cloverleaf even on version 5.2.
Then the vendor said “Oh we really don’t care about the HL7 version that much” and had been saying HL7 2.3 out of habit when they really should of said HL7 2.4.
Needless to say that cloverleaf is a little more picky about HL7 version numbers and when I switched to HL7 2.4 life got much easier.
Thanks for the help I do see it in 2.4 we are using 2.2. However I did find a tcl on this site and I modified it and was able to trim the ~ out of the message.
Thanks for all your help
Author
Replies
Viewing 4 reply threads
The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.