"1C" causes no-match

Clovertech Forums Read Only Archives Cloverleaf Cloverleaf "1C" causes no-match

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #54241
    Daniel Lee
    Participant

      We have an inbound document interface into Cloverleaf that receives MDM documents from a foreign interface engine.  It appears that sometimes user

    Viewing 7 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • #80697
        Dan Loch
        Participant

          Daniel,

          The same thing is happening on our engine.

          Have you any solution yet?

          Dan

        • #80698
          Charlie Bursell
          Participant

            I have written such things in the past but they become very convoluted.  So it is possible to do in PDL

            I would try it first with encapsulated mode under the TCP/IP protocol.  I have not tested it yet but I think it would work

          • #80699
            Charlie Bursell
            Participant

              I just tested it on my box.  I defined IB Protocol as TCPIP/Encapsulated and selected MLLP.  I then sent an HL7 message via PDL from another thread with an embedded HEX 1C.  I received entire message including the HEX 1C

              So if you use this you may want to add a simple string map command to remove any embedded HEX 1C characters

            • #80700
              Ronald Ortiz
              Participant

                Charlie Bursell wrote:

                I just tested it on my box.

              • #80701
                Darcy Kemp
                Participant

                  Hi, We are running 5.7.3 and don’t see an option for Encapsulated mode for TCP/IP.   How does one define it?  Thank you.

                • #80702
                  Russ Ross
                  Participant

                    Another approach to work around the problem could be to negotiate with vendor to see if they can do straight TCP/IP length encoded connection then whatever is sent will make it to Cloverleaf.

                    Once on Cloverleaf the undesired character can be stripped like Charlie already mentioned.

                    Russ Ross
                    RussRoss318@gmail.com

                  • #80703
                    Charlie Bursell
                    Participant

                      The obvious question is why are you still on 5.7?

                      The best solution would be to have your vendor read the HL7 standard with emphasis on communication protocols.  He would see that he, not you, should take care of the bogus charactor.

                    • #80704
                      Darcy Kemp
                      Participant

                        I have been in this particular position just 6 months.  In that time I have re-worked old xlates, tcls, and formats, to eliminate numerous standing issues, and resolved department issues.   I have move the engine from a non compliant to compliant Op sys and gone from 5.7 to 5.7.3.  Thanks Charlie..believe me…. I am working on it…  ðŸ™‚

                    Viewing 7 reply threads
                    • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.