We too have been running a bidirectional adt/orers/results and charges from scc thru cloverleaf to/from Mckesson Star .
It works…Lab complains about SCC’s (lack/slowness) responsiveness and costs associated with requests to them for fixes and enhancements ….
but that is not unusual with any vendor of signficant size in client base.
I know this..they do a much better job than Cerner. I get the feeling (from experience that) Cerner’s HL7 records are not “true” Hl7 in that the data seems to be cut/chopped from a dataqbase that was not defined with proper datatypes…it seems to be all character….often we get space filler in fields where it just doesnt make sense. You can tell cerner is taking fields from a fixed context/lack of proper property definiton and plugging it into fields with “|” bars and a bunch of “^”‘s etc….