I should have posted a follow-up. Jim, that was the issue from what I can tell. Charlie sent me another copy of the RTIF that had a:
rtif::shutdown
return “{KILL $mh}”
instead of:
rtif::shutdown
return “{}”
I wasn’t certain if the cmd process would still be able to kill the msg after the shutdown, and knew the proc had been modified, so I went looking.
And I agree on the proc status. I inherited this one and it has a few other flaws.
One weakness is that it doesn’t handle is the Invision “last record / not last record” indicator in the header. We are working on adding the functionality as well as variable padding for the header to allow for varying header size requirements. This will all be done via arguments in a proc name other than “RTIF” – to not add to the confusion.
Thank you for the note.
