Not trying to hijack this post, but I have a related question, trying to do an http post from Cloverleaf. When I execute the httppost the status returned is 400 Bad Request. But when I run httppost with DEBUG turned on, I can see that the receiving end is actually returning 201 Created. And I confirmed that the recipient is successfully receiving the post. Here is the DEBUG output:
C:>tcl
tcl>httppost {{URL http://hummsystems.appspot.com/api/sms/send/invite/web/00a815
32-8c11-0246-336d-720f17006bb1} {DATA data=%7B%22PatientFirstName%22%3A%20%22GLE
NN%22,%22MobilePhoneNumber%22%3A%20%22(512)845-7830%22,%22ProviderID%22%3A%20%22
314%22,%22ProviderFirstName%22%3A%20%22DAVID%22,%22ProviderLastName%22%3A%20%22W
EEKS%22,%22AppointmentTime%22%3A%20%2220180404065036%22,%22LocationID%22%3A%20%2
2ac394e50-40a6-50f9-bd89-68e1b0da6e08%22%7D&authToken=e8d3af48-4b8a-400c-b3d5-9e
6ed8224451} {DEBUG 1}}
* Hostname was NOT found in DNS cache
* Trying 172.217.12.84…
* Connected to hummsystems.appspot.com (172.217.12.84) port 80 (#0)
> POST /api/sms/send/invite/web/00a81532-8c11-0246-336d-720f17006bb1 HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: Quovadx CISAgent
Host: hummsystems.appspot.com
Accept: */*
From: anonymous@unknown.com
Connection: close
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 372
* upload completely sent off: 372 out of 372 bytes
< HTTP/1.1 201 Created
< Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
< Access-Control-Allow-Methods: POST, GET, PUT, UPDATE, OPTIONS, DELETE
< Access-Control-Allow-Headers: Content-Type, Accept, X-Requested-With, apikey,
accountid
< Access-Control-Max-Age: 1000000
< Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
< Pragma: no-cache
< Expires: 0
< X-Cloud-Trace-Context: 0ae0477e26a14203d8c259160ee9390a
< Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 19:31:01 GMT
< Content-Type: text/html
* Server Google Frontend is not blacklisted
< Server: Google Frontend
< Content-Length: 0
< X-Cache: MISS from WPBCWEB.arc.local
< Via: 1.1 WPBCWEB.arc.local (http_scan_byf/3.3.1)
< Connection: close
So, why is it giving a return status of 400 when a 201 was actually sent?
.
.