Training

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #55671
    Chad Walrath
    Participant

      I’ve worked with integration primarily on our EHR side (Epic) and I’d like to get up to speed in Cloverleaf.

      We had someone come out and give us an intro class to cover some of the basics like creating a site, process and thread.  We did this to lower the cost of training and to try and get training that was targeted at what we do with Cloverleaf (I’m told the Cloverleaf training can be very abstract).

      I understand simple procedural programming and am learning tcl from the web.  I don’t understand the overall Cloverleaf architecture, I’m trying to understand things like TPS from the online documentation, seeing how existing code works and looking at random posts here.  

      I would appreciate everyone’s thoughts on training.

      I understand Infor has recently updated some training…

      http://blogs.infor.com/learning/2017/01/updated-completely-rewritten-cloverleaf-tcl-course-now-available.html

      Has anyone been through this or can comment on the value of this training vs. past training?

      Thanks.

    Viewing 6 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • #86070
        Jim Kosloskey
        Participant

          Chad,

          Is your shop going to use Xlates or Tcl for Transformations?

          Does it primarily use the engine toolset for integrations or does it use Tcl at times (maybe mostly) instead of some of the Cloverleaf toolset?

          If your shop will be primarily Tcl then any Tcl class which attempts to relate Tcl to Cloverleaf (and I don’t know if the class you reference does that) will be of more use.

          On the other hand, if you will be using Tcl primarily to augment the engine and do things not provided for in the engine or its add-ons and use primarily Xlates for transformation, then the Tcl training will be helpful but there is more to know.

          Just my .02 cents.

          For example, I have been working with Cloverleaf since 1995 and I have not written a lot of Tcl nor needed to.

          email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

        • #86071
          Chad Walrath
          Participant

            Jim, appreciate the input.

            Right now, we’re primarily doing things in TCL, much less often xlate.

            During the training we had, we were shown xlates and I was impressed at how versatile they are but I guess I still had the idea that most stuff would have to be coded.  Its interesting to hear that’s what you use primarily.

          • #86072
            Darcy Kemp
            Participant

              Hi Chad,

              I have also worked with Cloverleaf for quite awhile and accomplish most challenges using creative xlates, brief tcl and the other tools available within those xlates.  When it’s been necessary to use tcl, I have been grateful for what has been shared on this site.

            • #86073
              Charlie Bursell
              Participant

                If two people have the same toolbox but use different tools from it to accomplish a task, it does not mean that either is wrong.  If the task is completed using minimal resources and is maintained, either one is correct.

                It depends on what you are comfortable doing.   I agree that is not wise to bypass Xlate altogether with Tcl,  But it is also not wise to create a non-maintainable mismash to force it though Xlate.  However, with routine copy, modification and looping, Xlate is much easier to maintain and modify.

                Remember, at least 70 percent  of the life cycle cost will be in maintenance.  And it will not always be maintained by you.

                Just my $0.02 worth

              • #86074
                Jeff Dinsmore
                Participant

                  To expand a bit on Charlie’s toolbox reference…

                  We all have access to the same tools, but most of us are more comfortable with that one special tool – the one we seem to use all the time.

                  We think “I should try out that other tool sometime”… but never get there because we don’t understand, don’t have the time, or more likely both.  So, it sits on the shelf.

                  One of the issues I hear from Chad’s original post is one of cost.  It’s expensive to get Cloverleaf training.  While training might give us a jump start on using some of those tools, we don’t all have travel/training budgets to spend $5000 on a Tcl class, for example.  And, if the training is not perceived to be of the very highest value, that makes it a pretty tough sell.

                  Even if we assume that all of us can afford to get all of the Cloverleaf training available from Infor, there is so much more to learn beyond that.

                  Collectively, as a group, we have a huge amount of expertise that spans the entirety of Cloverleaf.  What would you all think about putting together some mentoring sessions – maybe one per month – to share our expertise?

                  I have a couple decades of Tcl experience I can share.  I know there’s plenty the rest of you can teach me…

                  Jeff Dinsmore
                  Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

                • #86075
                  Chad Walrath
                  Participant

                    Jeff, I think that’s a great idea.  

                    From my perspective, I could see these being short (<15 minutes + time for Q&A?)- so you would lessen the burden on the presenter.  That is, they could be very informal and still be very useful.

                    Would Infor create a Webex for this kind of thing?

                  • #86076
                    Jeff Dinsmore
                    Participant

                      I’m thinking it’s hard to even get started in 15 minutes, but I’m open to discussion.

                      Jeff Dinsmore
                      Chesapeake Regional Healthcare

                  Viewing 6 reply threads
                  • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.