Question about EHR’s and their interface abilities

Clovertech Forums Read Only Archives Cloverleaf General Question about EHR’s and their interface abilities

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #54824
    Andrew Deters
    Participant

      What do the following use for interface needs:

      Meditech

      Epic

      Cerner

      Allscripts

      Do they have a proprietary interface engine you can use to interface with physician offices to deliver results?

      Do they use a 3rd party interface engine such as mirth or quovadx?

      What are the experiences with interfacing with Epic?  Good or Bad Easy or Hard?

    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • #83126
        James Cobane
        Participant

          In regards to interfacing with Epic, I wouldn’t say that it is “easy” but it is not difficult.

        • #83127
          bill bearden
          Participant

            Hello Andrew,

            We use Allscripts SCM in the hospital and Allscripts TouchWorks in the outpatient clinics.

            SCM uses an Allscripts product called eLink to process HL7 messages. There is a special version of eLink called ISS that handles only the HL7 messages in and out of SCM. Normal eLink (not the ISS version) is a general purpose engine and could, theoretically, do what we use Cloverleaf to do.

            TouchWorks uses an Allscripts product called ConnectR to send and receive HL7 messages. I have heard (just a rumor) that Allscripts will replace ConnectR with a 3rd party engine (not Cloverleaf  🙁  ) in the next year or two.

            In both cases, SCM and TW, we do as much as we can in Cloverleaf. Our interface team knows how to manipulate HL7 messages in Cloverleaf much better than in either eLink or ConnectR. We could do more, especially in eLink, but we don’t. I find eLink much more difficult to understand/use than Cloverleaf.

            Bill

          • #83128
            Vince Angulo
            Participant

              We use both Epic and Cerner.

              James covered Epic well.  Epic is not difficult to work with.  I really love that we have direct access to an Epic EDI engineer for support.  Bridges is a nice, straight forward set of tools to manage interfaces, but is not an engine.

              With Cerner you must have their interface engine (OpenEngine or OE) installed and you can work in OE and connect point to point with other applications or, as we do, use Cloverleaf as a central hub.  

              You can have OE with or without a developers license.  Without the developers license, you can configure comms, start/stop interfaces and change a few options — most everything else will require a Cerner paid engagement to change or add interfaces.  MDI’s also run through OE.  

              OE is nowhere as straight forward to use a Cloverleaf as there are two different front end tools as well as an almost non-documented back end module for the Oracle side, and most of the coding is done in their proprietary SQL, Cerner Command Language (CCL).  

              Support is all on-line, a little convoluted and customer service generally assumes you have a developer’s license and commensurate training/experience to implement your own fixes.

              Hope this helps.

          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • The forum ‘General’ is closed to new topics and replies.