Clovertech

ICD-10 and HL7

› Clovertech Forums › Read Only Archives › Cloverleaf › Cloverleaf › ICD-10 and HL7

  • Creator
    Topic
  • May 28, 2015 at 4:05 pm #54699
    Anonymous

      I am pretty sure it is but I just need to verify that Cloverleaf 6.1 is ICD-10 compliant.  Thanks

    • Creator
      Topic
    Viewing 3 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • May 28, 2015 at 4:28 pm #82619
        Jim Kosloskey
        Participant

          Has nothing to do with Cloverleaf and all to do with HL/7 and the trading partners.

          If everyone follows the standard fairly closely then it is just transformation.

          email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 30+ years Cloverleaf, 60 years IT – old fart.

        • May 28, 2015 at 4:41 pm #82620
          Anonymous

            Thanks Jim,  but my concern is with the element lengths in the HL7 variants in Cloverleaf, For example , in version 2.3 format, segment PR1.2 has a length of two,  that would need to be modified to 3 for ICD 10.  I was wondering if other formats were the same.  I have many variants and was hoping to not have to modify all of them but it looks like i will.

          • May 28, 2015 at 5:55 pm #82621
            Jim Kosloskey
            Participant

              PR1-2 and PR1-4 are in 2.3 for backward compatibility and should not be used for ICD-10.

              Instead the proper component(s) of PR1-3 should be used.

              email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 30+ years Cloverleaf, 60 years IT – old fart.

            • May 28, 2015 at 7:46 pm #82622
              Anonymous

                Thanks

            • Author
              Replies
            Viewing 3 reply threads
            • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.