Clovertech

‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘)

› Clovertech Forums › Read Only Archives › Cloverleaf › Cloverleaf › ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘)

  • Creator
    Topic
  • February 4, 2014 at 12:39 pm #54031
    Kevin Crist
    Participant

      We have a thread that is doing this alot. I’m not real sure what is happening. Cant tell if something is wrong with the HL7 message or what. I have seen this happen going to two different systems, one from our cloverleaf engine to an cloverleaf engine and the one’s below are going to the CSC. Not sure if that’s why or just a coincindence. Can someone point me in the right direction to help fix these?

      Thanks.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) No response within timeout or state 14 message resent.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) Resending msg at Tue Feb 04 07:12:55 EST 2014

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) No response within timeout or state 14 message resent.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) Resending msg at Tue Feb 04 07:13:55 EST 2014

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) No response within timeout or state 14 message resent.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) Resending msg at Tue Feb 04 07:14:55 EST 2014

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) No response within timeout or state 14 message resent.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) Resending msg at Tue Feb 04 07:15:55 EST 2014

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) No response within timeout or state 14 message resent.

      (RESEND_OB_MSG/to_rh_adt) Resending msg at Tue Feb 04 07:16:55 EST 2014

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

      [tps :tps :ERR /0:    to_rh_adt:02/04/2014 07:17:41] ‘KILL ‘ (returned by ‘validate_hl7ack ‘) does not match { }

    • Creator
      Topic
    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • February 4, 2014 at 5:03 pm #79922
        David Barr
        Participant

          Read this thread:

          https://usspvlclovertch2.infor.com/viewtopic.php?t=2416

          Also, make sure that your thread has “outbound only” checked on the inbound tab.

        • February 4, 2014 at 5:32 pm #79923
          Kevin Crist
          Participant

            Thanks for the reply. i have the outbound box checked. This thread has worked for months and is now starting this. It is set up like all other outbound threads we have and those dont have issues.

          • February 4, 2014 at 6:01 pm #79924
            Jim Kosloskey
            Participant

              Kevin,

              Based on what you have provided, I would take a look at the reply which arrived at the time the errors began and make sure it is as expected and that the validation proc will work with what is received.

              It appears the issue is with the acknowledgment validation proc. If that proc is being used without issue in other integrations then I would tend to suspect the reply it is receiving is not a structure it can properly handle or has data content leading the proc astray.

              Anyway that is where I would start.

              email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 30+ years Cloverleaf, 60 years IT – old fart.

          • Author
            Replies
          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.