- This topic has 6 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 5 months ago by
.
-
Topic
-
Hi, I am opening up a message in SMAT defined as follows:
MSH
RF1
{PRD}
{
[
PV1
[
{
PRB
[DG1]
[NTE]
}
]
]
}
[
{
RXO
ZRX
}
]
[{AL1}]
[{PR1}]
[
{
OBR
[{OBX}]
}
]
[ZFH]
[{NTE}]
For some reason when I load in a message according to these specs, it gets confused with the NTE segments. It thinks that the first NTE segment continues to the second NTE segment, even though it is at the end, then gives a bunch of errors saying The #9 segment ‘RXO’ is out of order. I verified my HL7 message and it looks fine. Any ideas?
-
Replies
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Marcus, I recall that sometimes the order of the repetition and optional notation in the variant can impact the parsing on certain releases of Cloverleaf.
Specifically not the notation for the PV1 group and the difference with the PRB group. The PVY group has the repetition notation followed by the optional notation. The PRB group is the opposite. This happens further into your variant as well. Try making the repetition ({) first followed by the optional ([) and see if that does not correct the situation.
{
[
PV1
[
{
PRB
[DG1]
[NTE]
}
]
]
}
email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.
-
- The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.
