I’ve gone down this path a number of times over the years, but have always ended up shelving it. Since we only have two sites and two staff members that work with Cloverleaf, it’s not been a priority.
As for the testing and applications specialists teams, they’ve never had a use for seeing the interfaces from a Cloverleaf point of view — they find it overwhelming and it doesn’t meet the “I only want to know what I need to know” test.
So my colleague has put together is a very simple block diagram in MS-Word (about three dozen real-time, HL7 interfaces) on one page. It turns out to be one of the most prized pieces of documentation for the apps/testing folks. It’s a case of “less being more”, or as our ITIL service model preaches, “users want holes, not drills”. We’re building our Sharepoint site now, and it’ll likely be a prominent link.
This may change as we implement more interfaces – -and quite rapidly, so I’m interested in seeing other responses to this thread.
Without hijacking this topic, I’m wondering a little deeper — an issue I have is documenting which procs are in which .tcl files and tracking where they’re used in Cloverleaf. I document this in the header comments of the proc itself, and in my own off-line documentation. Has anyone tackled that in an on-line format?
Thanks.