ACKS

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #51828
    Kevin Crist
    Participant

      We are sending adts/orders to a cardiology system. A few weeks ago we there was some changes made on their end and now they are having orders not show up. But i  have the ACK from them saying they go it, they insist since it is not in there logs they dont have it. It’s my understanding that if we have another applications accepted ack that they indeed have recieved the transaction and now out of CL hands. This should be all the proof i need but would there be anything more that i can get to show them?

      Example of ACK we are recieving.

      MSH|^~&||GSH|REG|GSH|20100621231641||ACK|622201031729938|P|2.3.1|

      MSA|AA|35671070|||F|

    Viewing 5 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • #71883
        Gary Atkinson
        Participant

          Well the way I see it If I (the engine) get an AA ack my job is done. You could also turn up the logging send the vendor what *your* log says.  I have played this game before and won  8)

        • #71884
          Kevin Crist
          Participant

            Thanks Gary. I will do that just for an extra I told you so.

            I too will win this.

          • #71885
            Gary Atkinson
            Participant

              You could simple ask “Why are you sending me an good ack if you are not processing the message?  Good Luck!

            • #71886
              Jim Kosloskey
              Participant

                Kevin,

                If the Control ID in the MSA  segment is the Control ID from the message you sent them (and that Control ID is relatively unique to the message sent) you have additional proof that they (or someone) responded to the message they say they did not receive.

                My question is – if they did not send you the acknowledgment who would have? Especially since on the same connection (apparently) they are getting the ADT messages and responding to them.

                email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 30+ years Cloverleaf, 61 years IT – old fart.

              • #71887
                Kevin Crist
                Participant

                  Thanks for you comments and reassurances. The recieving vendor finally admitting to seeing this at other sites and are going to do a release/fix.

                  Thanks.

                • #71888
                  Gary Atkinson
                  Participant

                    shocker  😯

                Viewing 5 reply threads
                • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.