Clovertech

Has anyone had these ‘IR_TAG’ errors before?

› Clovertech Forums › Read Only Archives › Cloverleaf › Cloverleaf › Has anyone had these ‘IR_TAG’ errors before?

  • Creator
    Topic
  • April 26, 2007 at 4:55 pm #49239
    David Gordon
    Participant

      Here is the error from the log:

      [0:TEST] Expected to find IR_TAG_GROUP, found IR_TAG_UNKNOWN

      PANIC: assertion ‘(ir)->ir_tag == (2)’ failed at IndexRepeat.cpp/667

      This happened in our environment when we upgraded to 5.4.1

      It seems to be an issue if there is a translate that uses Bulkcopy where there are Z segments in the inbound or outbound variant, but they worked in 5.3.3 fine.

      Can anyone enlighten me?

    • Creator
      Topic
    Viewing 2 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • April 26, 2007 at 6:01 pm #61201
        Daniel Lee
        Participant

          This happend to us when we upgraded from 3.8.1 to 5.4.  It seems like previous versions of Cloverleaf were a little more forgiving when doing a Bulk Copy where your outbound varrient didn’t match your inbound varient.  I cant remember the exact cause of the problem but the solution was to replace our Bulk Copy with PathCopys.

        • April 26, 2007 at 6:48 pm #61202
          David Gordon
          Participant

            So why does Quovadx still train people to use Bulkcopy?  We have new staff members here that were trained within the last two months, and Bulkcopy is still recommended as the best way to write translations…

          • April 27, 2007 at 2:26 pm #61203
            James Cobane
            Participant

              All,

              BULKCOPY is fine and dandy as long as both your inbound and outbound message structures are the same (i.e. same segments/groupings, etc.).

          • Author
            Replies
          Viewing 2 reply threads
          • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.