Clovertech

ACK^RDE

› Clovertech Forums › Read Only Archives › Cloverleaf › Cloverleaf › ACK^RDE

  • Creator
    Topic
  • April 5, 2005 at 2:53 pm #47607
    Jared Parish
    Participant

      I have a Other Vender sending an acknowledgment with a message type of “ACK^RDE”.  This seems to be throwing an error in the engine of “No routes defined for TrxId ‘ACK_RDE'”  Is this HL7 standard?  or have I not configured something correctly?

      Thanks,

      Jared Parish

      - Jared Parish

    • Creator
      Topic
    Viewing 4 reply threads
    • Author
      Replies
      • April 5, 2005 at 3:23 pm #56244
        Jim Kosloskey
        Participant

          Jared,

          If you do not intend to use the Recoveryxx Tcl procs for reply handling, you will need to route the reply in the NetConfig for the thread receiving the reply.

          Jim Kosloskey

          email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

        • April 6, 2005 at 11:08 am #56245
          Stephan Head
          Participant

            The HL7 standard started splitting out ACK’s for each message with release 2.3.1.  They added more in 2.4.  I believe this HL7 message showed up in 2.5.

          • April 6, 2005 at 2:20 pm #56246
            Jared Parish
            Participant

              I do use the recovery procs,  what could be causing this to slip through the cracks?

              Thanks,

              Jared

              - Jared Parish

            • April 6, 2005 at 5:21 pm #56247
              Stephan Head
              Participant

                If your thread is an outbound thread, on your Inbound tab under Thread Configuration, check to see if the Trx id determination Format is set to HL7.  If so, and you have a version set on there, the route id HAS to be there or you will get your error.  If you are using a variant, just add ACK^RDE as a valid message type.  You should be able to use ACK^A01, etc. as an example on how the message is constructed.

              • April 6, 2005 at 8:50 pm #56248
                Jim Kosloskey
                Participant

                  Jared,

                  If you are utilizing the Recoveryxx procs, assure your reply is being treated by the engine as a reply and not data; also insure you are killing the reply message in the inbound TPS UPoC.

                  Jim Kosloskey

                  email: jim.kosloskey@jim-kosloskey.com 29+ years Cloverleaf, 59 years IT - old fart.

              • Author
                Replies
              Viewing 4 reply threads
              • The forum ‘Cloverleaf’ is closed to new topics and replies.