- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 11 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hello,
Wanted to ask the community if there are any specific standards followed when looking at the size of Cloverleaf sites i.e. X amount of threads or processes determines when to split a site or if it’s dependent on a site volume or maybe both. Is there any recommendation to how many threads per process that determines when a process should be split out into multiple processes. Below is a break down of sites with threads/process count curious to hear what conventions other health systems follow in this regard.
<td width=”75″>site
<td width=”71″>ThreadCnt
<td width=”75″>ProcessCnt
epicf1 137 18 ewd 123 43 cac 119 39 epict1 115 17 seo 101 29 smd 99 30 sae 95 29 theradoc 86 6 sjst1 80 25 emrc 72 13 epicadt1 70 7 sjsf1 70 24 wwd 68 23 sfl 67 20 ephi 56 26 emra 53 18 emrdfh 52 14 pyxis 50 14 hshs 50 15 dbmtn 49 14 lab 49 13 sjcf 48 15 sjb 48 15 sjh 43 16 sjst2 42 14 gss 41 13 imaging 39 11 shect1 38 11 pos 32 4 hfg 32 8 conversion 31 17 shecf1 29 12 epicsynd 28 10 trans 26 7 sns 24 9 labhist 23 8 sql_lite 23 9 emrbg 22 11 onbase 22 6 vituity 21 3 cid 18 7 svgb 15 7 atlas 15 5 ephny 14 5 medgrp 14 5 accumen 12 4 empi 10 3 unipoc 10 5 sid 10 4 emrie 9 3 scottcr 8 4 sco 7 3 idph 6 2 ccd 6 6 smgb 4 2 riskmgt 4 2 prov 4 2 myrnding 4 2 chgconv 2 1
Viewing 1 reply thread
Viewing 1 reply thread
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.